<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple lawyers</title>
	<link>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ulrik</title>
		<link>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>ulrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>They missed the joking tone by about a football field. Just making something up is not making an april fool's "joke".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They missed the joking tone by about a football field. Just making something up is not making an april fool&#8217;s &#8220;joke&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SW</title>
		<link>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>SW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>The &#34;patent number&#34; doesn't just apply to Outlook though. It's actually not a patent number, but covers a whole class of trademark applications, which could, conceivably, include Photo Booth: 

The fact that Daniel *did* call it a patent number makes me think &#34;spoof&#34;, because it obviously isn't.  But is it really a good idea to alert Apple's lawyers to the fact that we *do* ship an almost exact copy of Photo Booth, just for a joke...?  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &quot;patent number&quot; doesn&#8217;t just apply to Outlook though. It&#8217;s actually not a patent number, but covers a whole class of trademark applications, which could, conceivably, include Photo Booth: </p>
<p>The fact that Daniel *did* call it a patent number makes me think &quot;spoof&quot;, because it obviously isn&#8217;t.  But is it really a good idea to alert Apple&#8217;s lawyers to the fact that we *do* ship an almost exact copy of Photo Booth, just for a joke&#8230;?  <img src='http://blog.floopily.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gro-don</title>
		<link>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Gro-don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Probably just a poor joke yes, and yet another proof that people clinically without humor should not be allowed to post on April 1st. It has all the signs of a person making jokes that make people ill at easy and angry and still never gets that they do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably just a poor joke yes, and yet another proof that people clinically without humor should not be allowed to post on April 1st. It has all the signs of a person making jokes that make people ill at easy and angry and still never gets that they do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Collins</title>
		<link>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Lawyers typically send letters or e-mail messages in this sort of situation, do they not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers typically send letters or e-mail messages in this sort of situation, do they not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo Padoan</title>
		<link>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Padoan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>The patent number he cites on http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel/news/2008_04_01-bye_bye_cheese is something else entirelly: http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/TrademarkScope#MS%20Outlook
"
 MS Outlook
IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G &#38; S: computer programs for providing enhanced electronic mail and scheduling capabilitie ...
"

(could not find it on google patent search)

Looks like another sick joke...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The patent number he cites on <a href="http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel/news/2008_04_01-bye_bye_cheese" rel="nofollow">http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel/news/2008_04_01-bye_bye_cheese</a> is something else entirelly: <a href="http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/TrademarkScope#MS%20Outlook" rel="nofollow">http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/TrademarkScope#MS%20Outlook</a><br />
&#8221;<br />
 MS Outlook<br />
IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G &amp; S: computer programs for providing enhanced electronic mail and scheduling capabilitie &#8230;<br />
&#8221;</p>
<p>(could not find it on google patent search)</p>
<p>Looks like another sick joke&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eetu</title>
		<link>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Eetu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>I think it was a funny one. Apparently credible enough to actually fool some people as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was a funny one. Apparently credible enough to actually fool some people as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Of course it's a joke.  Consider taking April 1st off and doing something outside so you don't have to deal with all of these lame attempts to shock (entertain?) us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it&#8217;s a joke.  Consider taking April 1st off and doing something outside so you don&#8217;t have to deal with all of these lame attempts to shock (entertain?) us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.floopily.org/2008/04/01/apple-lawyers/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Agreed. If this is an April fools joke i'll send Steve Ballmer over to Fucking Kill (TM) Daniel Siegel personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. If this is an April fools joke i&#8217;ll send Steve Ballmer over to Fucking Kill (TM) Daniel Siegel personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
